The Lender Grid · 2026 edition

Which lenders will actually engage with you?

Seven archetypes underwrite tech companies, and each plays a different game. The Grid crosses your revenue against your cap table and names the two to four lenders worth your time. Not the funds, not the terms. It tells you which conversations are worth having.

Answer two questions. We name your lenders.

1 · How much ARR do you run?
2 · Who is backing you?
Your lenders

Pick an ARR band and a posture above, or tap a cell in the grid.

Or browse the whole grid

ARR ╲ POSTUREThe AnointedTier 1–2 sponsorThe VouchedTier 3 sponsorThe DormantBacked, inactiveThe Self-MadeBootstrapped
$20M+Stabilizers
Scalers
Scalers
Stabilizers
Accelerators
Earners
Scalers
Accelerators
Earners
Accelerators
Scalers
Earners
$10–20MStabilizers
Scalers
Scalers
Stabilizers
Accelerators
Accelerators
Scalers
Earners
Earners
Accelerators
Streamers
$5–10MStabilizers
Scalers
Accelerators
Stabilizers
Accelerators
Stabilizers
Accelerators
Stabilizers
$2–5MStabilizersAccelerators
Streamers
Stabilizers
Accelerators
Streamers
Accelerators
Streamers
<$2MStabilizers
Streamers
Streamers
Accelerators
Streamers
Accelerators
Streamers
Accelerators

Bold = primary archetype, most likely to lead · Regular = engages seriously · Italic = engages conditionally. Off-grid, situational: the Securitizers and Tailors can appear in any cell; they underwrite a specific asset or a single carved-out feature, not a profile.

The archetypes · how they underwrite

Cost tracks risk. The cheapest capital goes to the lender taking the least.

No. I

The Stabilizers

Banks
The play

Cheapest capital in the market. The loan exists to win your deposits, treasury and payroll.

The cost

Single-digit IRR. Warrants minimal to none on the strongest deals.

The sizing

30 to 50% of your last equity round, not ARR, not EBITDA. Checks 1 to 20 million.

Insider warning

They underwrite the cap table, not the business. Equity must be recent (about 6 months) or closing within 3. Without it, even a Tier 1 name reads as theoretical.

No. II

The Scalers

BDCs and venture debt funds
The play

Brand-name venture debt, the big checks banks will not write. Underwrite growth and the enterprise value it implies.

The cost

Low to mid teens IRR, roughly 200 to 500 bps over a bank. Warrants a step up.

The sizing

Multiple of ARR or percent of last round, beyond bank levels. Checks 10 to 100 million and up.

Insider warning

Brand does not mean best deal. The answer when a bank cannot go big enough, not when one is willing. Do not pay Scaler pricing for a bank-profile company.

No. III

The Accelerators

ARR lenders
The play

Purpose-built to lend against recurring revenue. Home for the good SaaS business without a marquee sponsor.

The cost

Mid to high teens IRR, the highest of the profile lenders, priced for pure credit risk. Warrants common.

The sizing

50 to 100% of ARR, stretching to 125% for a pristine book. Checks 2 to 20 million.

Insider warning

The archetype most founders should know and most do not. Watch covenants: retention floors and cash triggers set too tight can trip a healthy business.

No. IV

The Earners

Cash-flow lenders
The play

Lend against EBITDA and its durability. Their appearance is a milestone: you borrow on your own economics, no sponsor backstop.

The cost

Low teens IRR. Warrants uncommon; success fee or equity option at the low end of the range.

The sizing

2 to 4x EBITDA, to 5x for durable margins. Terms run long (4 to 7 years) and amortize little.

Insider warning

Covenants are real and tested. Software-specialized funds may tie them to ARR, not pure EBITDA. Same archetype, different instrumentation.

No. V

The Streamers

Revenue-based lenders
The play

Advance against the revenue stream, repaid out of receipts. Fast, light diligence, dominant on small checks.

The cost

20s+ IRR and beyond. No warrants. Paid as a MOIC (Camp 1) or factor rate (Camp 2).

The sizing

40 to 70% of TTM revenue. Often sub 2 million checks.

Insider warning

Two camps, one name. Camp 1 is real revenue share that flexes (a tool). Camp 2 is MCA-style and amortizes from day one (a trap). Know which you have drawn.

Off-grid

The Tailors and Securitizers

Any band, any posture
The Securitizers: asset-backed

Lend against a specific asset (receivables, hardware, IP, loan books) at a 70 to 90%+ advance. Working capital, not growth; often runs alongside a growth facility. Near-bank pricing when collateral is strong.

The Tailors: specialty

Underwrite one carved-out feature, not a profile: a HNW guarantor, an anchor contract, a cohort-tied draw. Bespoke, costlier, more work to close. Papering over an unfinanceable business only deepens the problem.

Not sure which cell you are in? That is the first conversation.

Book a call